dahill d'onofrio stratford ct

There are 4 court records for "Dahill Donofrio" in "Fairfield County". WebView Dahill Donofrios profile on LinkedIn, the worlds largest professional community. WebDahill Donofrio 's birthday is 04/28/1954 and is 68 years old. FN1. m(%RS+Tu-e8LPuW-s?psgkT&ouHe^fkgGE;Z31Sr]-1* Vallejo Medical Center. View property details and household demographic information related to income, investments, and interests. 830, 838, 812 A.2d 51 (2002), cert. The Burns court, speaking through Chief Judge Feinberg, elaborated on our concerns, previously voiced in United States v. Lace, 669 F.2d 46 (2 Cir. Franklin Credit Management Corp. v. Nicholas, 73 Conn.App. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. The Allen majority criticized this court for having passed on the constitutionality of a "permissive presumption" statute, to wit, a New York statute providing that presence of a firearm in an automobile is presumptive evidence of its possession by all occupants, "on its face", 442 U.S. at 162-63, 99 S. Ct. at 2227-28. This read, 390 U.S. at 87, n. 2, 88 S. Ct. at 725, n. 2: Petitioner's plea of guilty did not, of course, waive his previous claim of the constitutional privilege. D'Onofrio's plea of guilty, also to Count Two, was taken on December 9. WebJoseph M Donofrio, 67 Resides in Naugatuck, CT Lived In Stratford CT, Fairfield CT Related To Linda Donofrio, Michael Donofrio, Susan Donofrio, Marietta Donofrio Also known as Joseph M D'Onofrio Includes Address (3) Phone (2) Email (2) See Results Joseph D Donofrio Resides in Coventry, CT Includes Address (1) See Results Joseph D 1397, 90th Cong., 2d Sess., reprinted in 1968 U.S.Code Cong. Donofrio, 4 Whip and the defendant Connecticut Environmental, LLC, have all appeared in this matter and were properly served with process. Robert Cushman appeared on his own behalf. Count One charged all defendants with a conspiracy2 wherein Francis Curcio would extend credit and direct the other defendants to extend credit with the understanding that delay in repayment or failure to make repayment could result in the use of violence or other criminal means to cause harm to the person, reputation and property of the debtors and others, and would demand weekly interest payments known as "vigorish" or "vig" payments which would extend the term of the loans, with the understanding of the defendants and the debtors that delay in repayment or failure to repay would have the described consequences, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Under the cases which we have cited and are cited by them, this would normally suffice to avoid condemnation under the void-for-vagueness doctrine. WebLived In Canton CT, West Hartford CT, Farmington CT, Wethersfield CT. Related To Elizabeth Donofrio, Leonard Donofrio, Susan Donofrio, John Donofrio. Cray also would have testified with respect to a loan by Gus Curcio and D'Onofrio to Benedetto at 4% per week which Cray guaranteed. 4 Whip objected thereto on September 13, 2010. As the Court recognized, the doctrine that a scienter argument may save a statute which might otherwise have to be condemned for vagueness stems from the plurality opinion in Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91, 101-02, 65 S. Ct. 1031, 1035-36, 89 L. Ed. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. 1489. Attorney Michael S. Casey appeared on behalf of the respondents. We need not decide, however, whether the void-for-vagueness and prejudicial publicity claims would have survived an unconditional plea of guilty, since we see no reason why either of these claims, at least if standing alone, was not a proper subject for reservation. 892(b) in order to establish a prima facie case " That representation would cover possibilities ranging from the Government's possession of evidence barely sufficient to trigger 892(b) up to cases where the only deficiency was the lack of direct evidence of the creditor's and the debtor's understanding. The Bank filed a reply memorandum on September 23, 2010, and the matter was heard at the short calendar on November 1, 2010. Attached to the Bank's reply are authenticated copies of the exhibits referred to in the second Hopkins affidavit. The court has already addressed the issues of standing and subject matter jurisdiction and need not revisit its prior analysis. x}ZKw6Wxd! 4q'qO'$fGRIs_ !$~R_>/OwgseGrY9t>}V?Tjuun~|wPKl_emc>|R~Y;8zW^uyRo4U-}ixo[o5__ g%ErH-v+oR~/Zu=6}SU? The proceedings were digitally recorded. 2d 162 (1970);5 that the United States would recommend a sentence of six years imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. Exterior rehabilitation of steeple and spire involving weathervane repair wood repairs preparation and repainting of steeple and lightning protection system upgrades. See generally Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104, 108-09 [92 S. Ct. 2294, 835-36, 33 L. Ed. Appellants' counsel addressed the issue in their reply brief and the matter was discussed extensively at oral argument, with the Government joining appellants in urging us to decide the issues reserved in the plea agreements. This extra-record evidence reflected that Success, Inc., had commenced the prior action shortly after the defen (emphasis supplied). 22-23), to vacate the convictions and permit withdrawal of the guilty pleas. Vallejo, CA 94589. Click to reveal Therefore, the fourth, fifth, seventh and eighth special defenses fail to preclude summary judgment. 2d 854 (1978); Papachristou v. Jacksonville, supra, 405 U.S. at 163, 92 S. Ct. at 843; and Boyce Motor Lines v. United States, 342 U.S. 337, 342, 72 S. Ct. 329, 331, 96 L. Ed. Find census, military, and other historical records.*. 4 records for "Dahill Donofrio" in "Fairfield County". Count Two charged the Curcios, D'Onofrio and Vagnini with an extortionate extension of credit to John Acabbo; Count Three charged Francis Curcio and Vagnini with such an extension of credit to Richard Alchimio; Count Four charged the Curcios and D'Onofrio with such an extension of credit to Ronald Benedetto; Count Five charged them with such an extension of credit to Norman Ellsworth; Count Six charged them with such an extension to Darryl Hardiman; and Count Seven charged them with such an extension to Donald Brutnell. Even if a special defense is a valid defense to a foreclosure action, and even if such a defense is sufficiently pled, the defendant still must produce sufficient evidence to support the defense in order to survive summary judgment. (Internal quotation marks omitted.) There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data. 4 Whip was served on January 20, 2009, and the defendant Connecticut Environmental, LLC, was served on January 21, 2009. Indeed, as pointed out in 1 Weinstein & Berger, Evidence under the United States Rules, p 303, at 303-25 (1982), the novelty of Allen, and the point on which the majority of five and the minority of four divided, was its holding that in determining whether a "permissive presumption" satisfied the rationality test "the proper evidence to scrutinize is not the general experience of the community or the validity of the legislative findings which support the presumption, but rather the evidence submitted in the particular case at issue." 1982), and United States v. Thibadeau, 671 F.2d 75, 79-80 (2 Cir. 989] (1954), or is so indefinite that "it encourages arbitrary and erratic arrests and convictions," Papachristou v. Jacksonville, 405 U.S. 156, 162 [92 S. Ct. 839, 843, 31 L. Ed. The prosecutor, evidently to comply with F.R.Cr.P. Leonard J. We found 15 phone numbers and email addresses. Bradshaw Smith v. James Redeker, Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Transportation; State of Connecticut Department of Transportation; Kevin Maloney, Chairman, State of Connecticut, Connecticut Public Transportation Commission; and State of Connecticut, Connecticut Public Transportation Commission. Furthermore, [t]he Superior Court is a court of general jurisdiction. You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. The fact that no other court has exclusive jurisdiction in any matter is sufficient to give the Superior Court jurisdiction of that matter [T]he general rule of jurisdiction is that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a Superior Court but that which specially appears to be so [N]o court is to be ousted of its jurisdiction by implication. (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Professor Saltzburg, disagreeing with much of Professor Westen's analysis, would nevertheless accept his formulation of the decisions if it were reworded to read: A defendant who has been convicted on a plea of guilty and who has complied with pre-plea procedural rules regarding notice of constitutional claims may challenge his conviction on any constitutional ground that, if asserted before trial, would forever preclude the state from obtaining a valid conviction against him on the charge to which he pleaded, regardless of how much the state might endeavor to correct the defect. 891 and 892: 891(6) An extortionate extension of credit is any extension of credit with respect to which it is the understanding of the creditor and the debtor at the time it is made that delay in making repayment or failure to make repayment could result in the use of violence or other criminal means to cause harm to the person, reputation, or property of any person. Presumably because his plea was to the conspiracy count, the prosecutor made no further proffer of evidence. Co. of Pennsylvania, 231 Conn. 756, 796, 653 A.2d 122 (1995). 2d 110] (1972), is void for vagueness. But the possibility of such violence would not have been the understanding of the creditor and the debtor at the time the loan was made, as 891(6) requires. Member of: Stamford Health Medical Group. Dahill and Samuel have resided together in a single family house in Stratford, CT. Dahill resides in Shelton, CT in a condominium with Deborah. Share. Accordingly, and for the foregoing reasons, the Bank's motion for summary judgment as to liability only is granted. All of which is corroborated by consentual [sic] tape recordings and physical evidence." Your IP: 975 Sereno Drive. Specifically, 4 Whip alleges: (1) failure to comply with the provisions of the note and deed; (2) failure to comply with mandatory conditions precedent to the acceleration of the loan and commencement of suit; (3) failure to provide the requisite notice pursuant to the terms of the note and deed; (4) lack of standing; (5) lack of subject matter jurisdiction; (6) lack of personal jurisdiction; (7) lack of subject matter jurisdiction in that no properly constituted entity owns and holds the [n]ote and/or [m]ortgage in question; and/or that any purported assignment or transfer thereof is ineffective and unenforceable; (8) lack of subject matter jurisdiction in that there is presently no proper party [p]laintiff before the [c]ourt, or if so, said party is not the legal owner of the [n]ote and [m]ortgage; and (9) defectiveness, unenforceability and/or prematurity of the Bank's action as a result of the foregoing special defenses. NOTICE: The special meeting scheduled in the following matter for March 5, 2014 at 9:30 AM was cancelled. The district court, on December 9, 1982, entered an order approving the defendants' reservation for appeal to this court of the issues described in Exhibit A to their respective plea agreements. Attorney Ryan W. Zaziri appeared on behalf of the respondents. Dahill has lived with Santa in a single family house in Stratford, CT. Search for birth, death, marriage, divorce, US Census, and military records. 688, 695, 751 A.2d 394 (2000). In other words, a plea of guilty may operate as a forfeiture of all defenses except those that, once raised, cannot be "cured". As of September 5, 2022, Freedom of Information Commission meetings and contested case hearings will resume being conducted in person. v~.c^kQNv}WW`wn#i!%G\S*W^ L0W6(&z,NeO?ybV0k(@e;n6! Cloudflare Ray ID: 7c0c6578fc39205d We reach a different conclusion, however, with respect to the propriety of the reservation of the claims that 892(b) works a shifting of the burden of proof in violation of In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 90 S. Ct. 1068, 25 L. Ed. The Government thus must establish that the defendant understood that his conduct could have the stated consequences. 5841. Viewing the available evidence in a light most favorable to 4 Whip, the Bank has established a prima facie case of mortgage foreclosure and 4 Whip's special defenses are insufficient to withstand the entry of summary judgment. 2d 747 (1970) (guilty plea under statute permitting death sentence if jury's verdict so recommended which had been held unconstitutional in United States v. Jackson, 390 U.S. 570, 88 S. Ct. 1209, 20 L. Ed. The requirement that the act must be willful or purposeful may not render certain, for all purposes, a statutory definition of the crime which is in some respects uncertain. When a complaint and supporting affidavits establish an undisputed prima facie case for a foreclosure action, a court must only determine whether [a] special defense is legally sufficient before granting summary judgment. LaSalle National Bank v. Shook, Superior Court, judicial district of New London, Docket No. For further information concerning these hearings, please contact the Commissions administrative office at 18-20 Trinity Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06106: telephone (860) 566-5682. See also United States v. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers, 352 U.S. 567, 590-92, 77 S. Ct. 529, 540-41, 1 L. Ed. 4Whip has brought forth no evidence with which to support its special defenses or raise a genuine issue of material fact in this matter. You can email the site owner to let them know you were blocked. Specifically, 4 Whip argues that the Bank lacks standing to bring the present action because Taylor was not assigned the subject mortgage at the time the action was originally commenced. Attorney Alice M. Sexton appeared on behalf of the respondents. ), aff'd, 67 Conn.App. The plea agreements with the other defendants were similar except that Gus Curcio and D'Onofrio were to plead guilty to Count Two and Garcia to Count One; that the recommended sentences were to be four years for D'Onofrio and one year for Garcia; and that Exhibit A attached to each agreement was limited to the first two questions listed in Exhibit A to the agreement with Francis Curcio and the representation by the United States was limited to its need to utilize 18 U.S.C. A "permissive presumption" thus is valid unless "under the facts of the case, there is no rational way the trier could make the connection permitted by the inference." WebGet Notified when Dahill A Donofrio's info changes Unlock Background Report View Cell Phone Number The landline phone number 2033789125 is registered to Dahill A v. Khan, Superior Court, judicial district of Fairfield, Docket No. (3) At the time the extension of credit was made, the debtor reasonably believed that either, (A) one or more extensions of credit by the creditor had been collected or attempted to be collected by extortionate means, or the nonrepayment thereof had been punished by extortionate means; or. As the Court there observed, 328 U.S. at 647-48, 66 S. Ct. at 1184: A different case would arise if the substantive offense committed by one of the conspirators was not in fact done in furtherance of the conspiracy, did not fall within the scope of the unlawful project, or was merely a part of the ramifications of the plan which could not be reasonably foreseen as a necessary or natural consequence of the unlawful agreement. Stratford, Connecticut. The district judge abused his discretion in accepting a plea permitting such a question to be put to us.14 Compare Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Mackey, 351 U.S. 427, 437, 76 S. Ct. 895, 900, 100 L. Ed. regular Practice Book 9-16 provides: If, pending the action, the plaintiff assigns the cause of action, the assignee, upon written motion, may either be joined as a co-plaintiff or be substituted as a sole plaintiff, as the judicial authority may order; provided that it shall in no manner prejudice the defense of the action as it stood before such change of parties.. stream As said in Menna v. New York, supra, 423 U.S. at 62-63 n. 2, 96 S. Ct. at 242 n. 2, "a counseled plea of guilty is an admission of factual guilt so reliable that, where voluntary and intelligent, it quite validly removed the issue of factual guilt from the case." They have also lived in 1489 (1946), which the Government would use in counts three through seven to establish defendant Francis Curcio's guilt violates defendant Francis Curcio's rights so as to require dismissal of counts three through seven against him. KUWIrpQI)M}D.0#n)fj6E It has jurisdiction of all matters expressly committed to it and of all other matters cognizable by any law court of which the exclusive jurisdiction is not given to some other court. WebTop 3 Results for Dahill Donofrio in CT 1 The best result we found for your search is Dahill A Donofrio age 60s in Shelton, CT in the Shelton neighborhood. CV 99 0549266 (July 13, 2000, Martin, J. The reason for the sparse discussion of the survival of the constitutional claim is clear. 2d 195 (1975) (per curiam) (double jeopardy). The prosecutor represented that Alchimio would have testified that at the time the extensions of credit were made, he believed that physical harm would come to him if he failed to repay the loans, and that this belief was based on his awareness of Francis Curcio's reputation in the community. The attorneys all responded "No", and one of them said "It is our contention, your Honor, that the Government could offer proof to that effect.". NOTICE: The special meeting scheduled in the following matter for March 6, 2014 at 9:30 AM, was postponed. WebDahill Donofrio was associated with Sultan Realty Management in 2014. X/4b4HiRR)z_HcJ4(ac9)4+w{`U}d`B9dA`m&8~*bL-iMac8WBmb|_ smed|4K5\D}+(?*ZOy5E`R64/n*`-%(P),Eh.A'j *]M=o5\/5s Building. Saltzburg, Pleas of Guilty and the Loss of Constitutional Rights: The Current Price of Pleading Guilty, 76 Mich. L. Rev. FN2. In invalidating the Pennsylvania statute there at issue, the Court relied heavily on the absence of a scienter requirement, saying that it had "long recognized that the constitutionality of a vague statutory standard is closely related to whether that standard incorporates a requirement of mens rea." Conf.Rep. Web3 FREE public records found for Dahill Donofrio in Stratford, CT. FastPeopleSearch results include contact information such as addresses, phone numbers, and email 54(b)); Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co., 351 U.S. 445, 452-53, 76 S. Ct. 904, 908-909, 100 L. Ed. (2) The extension of credit was made at a rate of interest in excess of an annual rate of 45 per centum calculated according to the actuarial method of allocating payments made on a debt between principal and interest, pursuant to which a payment is applied first to the accumulated interest and the balance is applied to the unpaid principal. 'Bd} MEs5F4 i/ endobj 134, 137, 948 A.2d 1035 (2008). Med Offices 1st Fl Dept #130. We identified 4 records related to "Dahill Donofrio" in the state of Connecticut. While the Government may be right in saying that the issue of the constitutionality of 892(b) will not simply "go away" after a trial, a trial will develop the material which Allen held that reviewing a court must have before passing on that issue. 682 (Supp. David L. Dahill is a family medicine doctor in Vallejo, California and is affiliated with Kaiser Permanente Vallejo Medical Center. 2d 628 (1974) (prosecution's making more serious charge after defendant had exercised right to seek trial de novo in higher court); and Menna v. New York, 423 U.S. 61, 96 S. Ct. 241, 46 L. Ed. If it did not follow that course, it could have chosen not to defend convictions on the substantive crimes on appeal rather than provide Francis Curcio with a vehicle for challenging Pinkerton in the Supreme Court. Discover work experience, company details, and more. The proceedings were digitally recorded. NOTICE: The special meeting scheduled in the following matter for March 7, 2014 at 9:30 AM, was postponed. Furthermore, the foreclosing party must demonstrate that all conditions precedent to foreclosure, as mandated by the note and mortgage, have been satisfied. Bank of New York v. Conway, 50 Conn.Sup. Appellants also argue that some of the requirements for the prima facie case set forth in 892(b) are unconstitutionally vague and that this taints 892(a). 2d 196 (1975). Reconnect with Dahill Donofrio by joining our alumni site today. We are thus being asked to pass on a contention raising constitutional questions, governed by a Supreme Court decision that has been puzzling to commentators12 and to courts,13 which demand careful scrutiny of a trial record and instructions which do not exist. Unlike the frequent case where the maximum punishment under the general conspiracy section, 18 U.S.C. See also Lefkowitz v. Newsome, 420 U.S. 283, 95 S. Ct. 886, 43 L. Ed. Defendant had moved for dismissal of a count in an indictment charging this offense on the ground that compelling registration violated his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, and pleaded guilty after his motion was denied. Greenwich Silver Shield Association v. Director, Human Resources Department, Town of Greenwich; Human Resources Department, Town of Greenwich; and Town of Greenwich, Robert Cushman v. Chief, Police Department, Town of Montville; and Police Department, Town of Montville, Dahill Donofrio v. Assessor, Town of Stratford; and Town of Stratford, Kareem Hedge v. Chief, Police Department, City of Bridgeport; and Police Department, City of Bridgeport, Edward Peruta v. Reuben Bradford, Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection; and State of Connecticut, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Edward Peruta v. Reuben Bradford, Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Division of State Police; Paul Mounts, Supervisor, State of Connecticut, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Division of State Police; and State of Connecticut, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Division of State Police, Edward Peruta v. Reuben Bradford, Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Division of State Police; and State of Connecticut, Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Division of State Police, Paul Baer v. William Witkowski, Chairman, Board of Education, Thompson Public Schools; and Board of Education, Thompson Public Schools, Bradshaw Smith v. James Readeker, Commissioner, State of Connecticut, Department of Transportation; State of Connecticut Department of Transportation; Kevin Maloney, Chairman, State of Connecticut, Connecticut Public Transportation Commission; and State of Connecticut, Connecticut Public Transportation Commission, Anne Stevenson v. Chief Public Defender, State of Connecticut, Office of the Public Defender, Division of Public Defender Services; and State of Connecticut, Office of the Public Defender, Division of Public Defender Services. 2d 777 (1979). The second Hopkins affidavit assert[s] that the affiant [is] employed by the servicing agent for the substitute plaintiff, a relationship strong enough to establish a foundation for the affiant's claims that she [is] familiar with the books and records regarding the defendant's indebtedness. Bank of America, FSB v. Franco, 57 Conn.App. This is the third time in which appellants Francis and Gus Curcio have been before us in this case, see 680 F.2d 881 (1982); 694 F.2d 14 (1982). However, in light of the contemplation of the plea agreement that no jury would ever be impaneled, the question reserved must be read to be that the pretrial publicity was so serious that none of these measures could repair the damage and that dismissal of the indictment was required. However, since litigants ordinarily have a constitutional right to have issues of fact decided by a jury the moving party for summary judgment is held to a strict standard of demonstrating his entitlement to summary judgment. (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google. Francis Curcio's Pinkerton claim likewise would not have survived an unconditional plea of guilty since there would be nothing to show that the Government could not have produced direct evidence that he had committed or aided or abetted in committing the substantive crimes sufficient to avoid any need to invoke Pinkerton. It will be time enough for the Court to reconsider Pinkerton, if it desires to do so, in a case where it has a full record and application of the rule would make some substantial difference. 1311 (1956) (id.). at the time the extension of credit was made. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Nevertheless, the plaintiff has attached a properly authenticated affidavit to its reply memorandum, curing the alleged deficiencies in the original Hopkins affidavit.6. 894 against void-for-vagueness attack). 1489 (1946), to establish a prima facie case against defendant Francis Curcio in count three. Also known as Leonard J D'Onofrio, Leonard Onfrio, Leonard Donotrio, Lenny D Onofrio. Click to reveal Ryders Health Management Location 7003 Main St, Stratford, Connecticut, 06614, United States Description Industry The issue of standing implicates subject matter jurisdiction [I]t is the burden of the party who seeks the exercise of jurisdiction in his favor clearly to allege facts demonstrating that he is a proper party to invoke judicial resolution of the dispute. (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
Is Jonny West Still With Margie, Morning Koffy Cancelled, Difference Between Models And Methods, Bookshark Vs Timberdoodle, Cincture 5 Knots, Articles D